shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:03:47 -0400
- Organization: Itumi, LLC
We certainly have a good model now to pass around data from component to component. But that doesn't help if we don't actually put the right data in there.
On 6/23/11 7:56 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
On 6/23/11 7:51 PM, "Chad La
Joie"<>
wrote:
Well, the real question is what data is needed to make the decision and
where is it kept? Should the decoders/encoders, for example, know
whether the binding is back-channel or front-channel? If so, are there
are other possibilities in other protocols that we should take in to
account?
Yes, that's why I was questioning whether we already had a sufficient
abstraction that anything likely to matter would be available.
(And the answer to that particular question is yes in my experience.)
-- Scott
--
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered
- [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/24/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.