shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:56:08 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
On 6/23/11 7:51 PM, "Chad La Joie"
<>
wrote:
>Well, the real question is what data is needed to make the decision and
>where is it kept? Should the decoders/encoders, for example, know
>whether the binding is back-channel or front-channel? If so, are there
>are other possibilities in other protocols that we should take in to
>account?
Yes, that's why I was questioning whether we already had a sufficient
abstraction that anything likely to matter would be available.
(And the answer to that particular question is yes in my experience.)
-- Scott
- [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/24/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Cantor, Scott E., 06/23/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Sign/encrypt control, Chad La Joie, 06/23/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.