Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

Yeah, I'm iterating through a lot of ideas on this right now.  So far, 
I've considered three possibilities:
 - leave it as is
 - Double the properties we have today and make one set for 
front-channel and the other set for back-channel.  However, this means 
the IdP will need to directly understand those concept (it doesn't today).
 - Have a pluggable strategy.

On 6/23/11 4:23 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> On 6/23/11 4:17 PM, 
> ""<>
> wrote:
>
> > Author: lajoie
> > Date: Thu Jun 23 21:17:55 2011
> > New Revision: 3939
> >
> > URL:
> > http://svn.shibboleth.net/view/java-identity-provider?rev=3939&view=rev
> > Log:
> > SAML 1 and 2 profile configurations - still need to look at how
> > sign/encrypt options as specified
>
> I speculated on the users list that we might consider making the decision
> point on signing and encryption pluggable so that people with different
> opinions about the set of options and conditions to support could plug in
> their own "decider".
>
> You may have just meant "options" in the sense of algorithms and so forth,
> but I think the 4-way toggle also wants expanding.
>
> -- Scott

--
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered