Shibboleth Developers

[Andrew Petro <>]

> these Java-based packaging suggestions are irrelevant when the SP is 
not in Java.

Heh.  Sorry, good catch.  That makes my Jasig ResourceServer reference 
less directly relevant.

I hope it can nonetheless be decent inspiration for navigating the 
problem space.  Insights like the need to be able to easily turn off the 
minification in development seem obvious but were hard-won.

Andrew


On 01/06/2011 11:06 AM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> > It does but that wasn't my point. My point is that packaging is only
> > a problem if your JS is very large. Re-using JQuery infrastructure an
> > a selection of good JS plugins will probably reduce the size of the JS
> > quite a bit.
> I'm not sure why, it still has to all be hosted by the same site, doesn't
> it? The browser can't load the same scripts from the cache when they're
> served by different sites, can it?
>
> Regardless, I wanted to note that these Java-based packaging suggestions
> are irrelevant when the SP is not in Java. (Rephrasing, no, I'm not adding
> Maven to my build.)
>
> -- Scott