Shibboleth Developers

["RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>]

> Yes, that's what it is. Might I suggest it would be a mistake to build 
> something now and not support some subset of SAML 2.0, though? We don't 
> want to build new, instantly obsolete, endpoints.

I see componentspace.com does have a SAML 2.0 .NET component also (cool).

If Whipplehill is expecting to deploy all new SAML infrastructure then 
using 2.0 is definitely the way to go.  If they're expecting to work with 
existing federations, or I guess with the Shib support that is currently 
shipping in Moodle, then SAML 1.1 would be needed.  Supporting both (as 
Shibboleth 2.0 does) would provide maximum flexibility.

 - RL "Bob"