shibboleth-dev - Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Chris G. Sellers" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:09:08 -0400
Scott,
You do need an SP. They include the glue to talk to an SP which I think is mostly some php. It works really well, auto-provisioning and everything. They did a good job in my opinion.
Sellers
On Mar 27, 2008, at 4:27 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
If Whipplehill is expecting to deploy all new SAML infrastructure then
using 2.0 is definitely the way to go. If they're expecting to work with
existing federations, or I guess with the Shib support that is currently
shipping in Moodle, then SAML 1.1 would be needed. Supporting both (as
Shibboleth 2.0 does) would provide maximum flexibility.
Sorry, I didn't realize anything shipped with Moodle, I assumed it was glued
to an SP separately. Somebody recently asked about Moodle here, and I had
the impression they were planning to install the SP with it.
-- Scott
______________________________________________
Chris G. Sellers | NITLE - Technology Team
734.661.2318 |
AIM: imthewherd | GoogleTalk:
- .NET Shibboleth IdP, wesp, 03/27/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Tom Scavo, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Wes Plybon, 03/28/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/28/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 03/28/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.