shibboleth-dev - RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: <>
Subject: RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:27:52 -0400
Organization: The Ohio State University

> If Whipplehill is expecting to deploy all new SAML infrastructure then
> using 2.0 is definitely the way to go. If they're expecting to work with
> existing federations, or I guess with the Shib support that is currently
> shipping in Moodle, then SAML 1.1 would be needed. Supporting both (as
> Shibboleth 2.0 does) would provide maximum flexibility.

Sorry, I didn't realize anything shipped with Moodle, I assumed it was glued
to an SP separately. Somebody recently asked about Moodle here, and I had
the impression they were planning to install the SP with it.

-- Scott

.NET Shibboleth IdP, wesp, 03/27/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Tom Scavo, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
  - RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
    - RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
      - Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 03/27/2008
      - RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Wes Plybon, 03/28/2008
  - RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/28/2008
  - Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 03/28/2008

List archive

RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP