shibboleth-dev - RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:07:32 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> something I'm not getting :) After reviewing the draft, it would appear
> that Shibboleth 1.3 is pretty much "out-of-the-box" SAML 1.1 with some
extra
> information exchange services.
Yes, that's what it is. Might I suggest it would be a mistake to build
something now and not support some subset of SAML 2.0, though? We don't want
to build new, instantly obsolete, endpoints.
> Appended is a sample saml response generated from the IdP. I can provide
> more information if neccessary. Admittedly, I'm new to the whole SSO deal
> and am not quite sure, exactly, what needs to happen in the Shibboleth
> authentication process.
I'm not sure what your question actually is..."is my response OK?" Something
else?
-- Scott
- .NET Shibboleth IdP, wesp, 03/27/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Tom Scavo, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/27/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 03/27/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Wes Plybon, 03/28/2008
- RE: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Scott Cantor, 03/28/2008
- Re: .NET Shibboleth IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 03/28/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.