shibboleth-dev - Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:09:35 +0100
- Organization: SWITCH
Sorry, the gcj is the non-standard binary format. The rest holds true for both of them.
Scott Cantor wrote:
So, just to be clear, gij is NOT Java where Java is defined as a
particular bytecode format, runtime environment, and a specific set of
classes. gij uses a different binary format, the C++ runtime, and a
different set of classes with some overlap of the Java classes. So
using gij is *really* hard.
gij or gcj? In any case, my warning spans both gcj and just RPM packaging of
Java code in general. It's hideously bad when I've tried it.
-- Scott
--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
http://www.switch.ch
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, (continued)
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chad La Joie, 01/23/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 01/23/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chad La Joie, 01/23/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 01/23/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 01/24/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chris G. Sellers, 01/28/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chad La Joie, 01/28/2008
- RE: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Scott Cantor, 01/28/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chad La Joie, 01/28/2008
- RE: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Scott Cantor, 01/28/2008
- Re: Build of 2.0 beta1 IdP, Chad La Joie, 01/28/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.