Shibboleth Developers

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> So, just to be clear, gij is NOT Java where Java is defined as a
> particular bytecode format, runtime environment, and a specific set of
> classes.  gij uses a different binary format, the C++ runtime, and a
> different set of classes with some overlap of the Java classes.  So
> using gij is *really* hard.

gij or gcj? In any case, my warning spans both gcj and just RPM packaging of
Java code in general. It's hideously bad when I've tried it.

-- Scott