Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Velpi <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap
  • Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:09:24 +0100

Unassigned Features

* ARP and Attribute resolver management UI

How is this different than MAMS ShARPE?

ShARPE doesn't do resolver management and as of yet does not have a release timeline.

While we're at it:
* metadata management UI
...
this all would eventually most likely become sth like:
* resolver-ARP-metadata management UI (modular)

Question is: do you really want your metadata to be editable easily? I guess not, but there are a lot of ways to prevent tampering.


Metadata management might even include a request form to join a certain "federation" (aka "Resource Registry"). That might go as far as warning when certificates are near to passing their validity period...

Maybe it is interesting to think of putting a reference inside the metadata itself (if allowed by the spec) that can tell where a (program) should go fetch an update. The number of metadata files on a system will increase as federations start to coƶperate...


Whatever happens, "modular" and "code/library re-use" should be on top of the list for every component surrounding Shibboleth -I think-, so it's easy to fit all the pieces together.


--Velpi



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page