shibboleth-dev - Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Tom Scavo" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:25:25 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZxQBddgAR9D/CYHxI02PBwynAx3eqx256nSBlVhSdBqcNeSPQfCYaFmqilueQJjgRysseqU7Igde63ZkJzWv+UOiPZzgI85f77zrvHzYM/+PAtukCKd2TWgHyxUm4CBjI+yQPzo5K/dLZ+3NXrra4QiSPgoKbIsDhjHXXiamV4s=
On 3/10/06, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> Tom Scavo wrote:
> >> This release will be interoperable with Shibboleth 1.2 and 1.3 service
> >> providers, but will drop support for Shibboleth 1.1.
> >
> > I assume you mean the Shib 2.0 IdP will interoperate with all SPs
> > (except 1.1), but that the Shib 2.0 SP will only interoperate with the
> > Shib 2.0 IdP. Will the Shib 2.0 SP consume SAML 1.1 assertions?
>
> Nope, the 2.0 SP will work with IdP versions 1.2 and 1.3
Awesome! You might want to rewrite that line in the Roadmap since I
didn't get that from reading it.
> >> Service Provider
> >> This release will provide both a C++ and Java (Servlet 2.3 or better)
> >> service provider with similar feature sets.
> >
> > Awesome! If the Java SP can consume SAML 1.1 assertions, we will
> > almost certainly find use for it in our project.
>
> Like I mentioned above, the SPs will work with SAML 1.1
Whoa! Did you guys get a grant or something? I wasn't expecting to
see the Java SP in 2.0, let alone an SP that interoperates with SAML
1.1.
> >> Unassigned Features
> >>
> >> * ARP and Attribute resolver management UI
> >
> > How is this different than MAMS ShARPE?
>
> ShARPE doesn't do resolver management and as of yet does not have a
> release timeline.
Right, I was referring to the ARP features. Does it do what I tried
to describe in the previous message?
Thanks,
Tom
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, (continued)
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Will Norris, 03/09/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Chad La Joie, 03/09/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/09/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Thomas Lenggenhager, 03/13/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/13/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Chad La Joie, 03/13/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/13/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Francisco Queiros Pinto, 03/13/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Tom Scavo, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Chad La Joie, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Tom Scavo, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Chad La Joie, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Velpi, 03/12/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Tom Scavo, 03/12/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Simon McLeish, 03/15/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/15/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Simon McLeish, 03/16/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/16/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/15/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Ian Young, 03/15/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Simon McLeish, 03/15/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Tom Scavo, 03/12/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Tom Scavo, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Chad La Joie, 03/10/2006
- RE: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Scott Cantor, 03/10/2006
- Re: Soliciting Feedback, Shibboleth 2 Roadmap, Tom Scavo, 03/10/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.