shibboleth-dev - Re: SAML name identifiers

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Will be shortly.

On Mar 3, 2006, at 15:57, Scott Cantor wrote:

Probably not. It was mainly implemented for the SAML interop because

Shibboleth normally uses a relatively worthless identifier.

SAML name identifiers, Tom Scavo, 03/02/2006
- RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/02/2006
  - Re: SAML name identifiers, Ian Young, 03/03/2006
    - Re: SAML name identifiers, Walter Hoehn, 03/03/2006
      - Re: SAML name identifiers, Ian Young, 03/03/2006
        
        Re: SAML name identifiers, Alistair Young, 03/03/2006
        
        Re: SAML name identifiers, Ian Young, 03/03/2006
        
        RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/03/2006
        
        RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/03/2006
        
        Re: SAML name identifiers, Nate Klingenstein, 03/03/2006
    - RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/03/2006
      - Re: SAML name identifiers, Ian Young, 03/03/2006
        
        RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/03/2006
        
        Re: SAML name identifiers, Ian Young, 03/07/2006
        
        RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/07/2006
  - Re: SAML name identifiers, Tom Scavo, 03/05/2006
    - RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2006
      - Re: SAML name identifiers, Tom Scavo, 03/05/2006
        
        RE: SAML name identifiers, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2006
        
        Re: SAML name identifiers, Tom Scavo, 03/05/2006