shibboleth-dev - RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:33:21 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> So are the NameIDFormat elements present only on some entities in IQ and
> IC because they were added after the initial conversion to the SAML
> metadata format?
I wasn't aware any were missing, but it's certainly possible. I thought your
style sheet created them. If not, that would explain why they aren't there.
> I mean, there doesn't *have* to be a reason for this, it could just be
> randomness. If I was going to do something for completeness, I'd just
> add it to everything though.
I thought we had, but since InQueue is soon to die, I'm not about to worry
about it now.
> I'm considering proposing adding these to everything in SDSS, because
> I'm generally a believer of making the default explicit when possible.
> I can't think of a plausible deployment that this would cause trouble
> for, but if anyone else can I'd appreciate a heads-up...
I can't see any way it would break something, but if somebody were altering
their deployment to use some other Format, certainly their metadata ought to
reflect that choice.
-- Scott
- NameIDFormat metadata elements, Ian Young, 12/07/2005
- RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Scott Cantor, 12/07/2005
- Re: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Ian Young, 12/08/2005
- RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Scott Cantor, 12/08/2005
- Re: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Ian Young, 12/08/2005
- RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Scott Cantor, 12/08/2005
- Re: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Ian Young, 12/08/2005
- RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Scott Cantor, 12/08/2005
- Re: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Ian Young, 12/08/2005
- RE: NameIDFormat metadata elements, Scott Cantor, 12/07/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.