shibboleth-dev - RE: Future of the WAYF discussion

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: Future of the WAYF discussion

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: "'Tom Scavo'" <>, <>
Subject: RE: Future of the WAYF discussion
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:06:40 -0400
Organization: The Ohio State University

> I know how this cookie is defined in SAML 2.0, but has its syntax or
> semantics changed along the way in Shibboleth 1.3?

It has no semantics in Shibboleth, nor does the WAYF itself.

-- Scott

Future of the WAYF discussion, Chad La Joie, 09/26/2005
- Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Chad La Joie, 09/26/2005
- Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Tom Scavo, 09/26/2005
  - RE: Future of the WAYF discussion, Scott Cantor, 09/26/2005
    - Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Tom Scavo, 09/26/2005
      - RE: Future of the WAYF discussion, Scott Cantor, 09/26/2005
    - RE: Future of the WAYF discussion, Scott Cantor, 09/26/2005
- Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Spencer W. Thomas, 09/27/2005
  - Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Steven_Carmody, 09/27/2005
    - Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Chad La Joie, 09/27/2005
    - Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Rod Widdowson, 09/27/2005
      - RE: Future of the WAYF discussion, Scott Cantor, 09/27/2005
        
        RE: Future of the WAYF discussion, Steven_Carmody, 09/28/2005
      - Re: Future of the WAYF discussion, Thomas Lenggenhager, 09/28/2005

List archive

RE: Future of the WAYF discussion