Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Future of the WAYF discussion

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Future of the WAYF discussion


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: Future of the WAYF discussion
  • Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:58:46 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tyQqQbITk32TcxBTlpV2V55J106yIkA0ZqnwEIiKNKhy62tk2tKjILndCcIUQJrBdyFQmtXvvIlAZaxnKMl3Tza2vKYi43oGUr5dAmpukcTzwWIYG3x5D7t0gg9OroF39/xyzl65w2mAjZlD3SHwukkcwICfJKSuDA6vvIVhqvM=
On 9/26/05, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
>
> I also think that the use of the _saml_idp cookie could alleviate a lot of
> the burden of having to sort through a possibly long list of IdPs by
> allowing recently used ones to be displayed first in the list.

I know how this cookie is defined in SAML 2.0, but has its syntax or
semantics changed along the way in Shibboleth 1.3?

> ... the same _saml_idp cookie sorting mechanism
> mentioned above could be used to further help users choose the right IdP
> quickly.

Same question for the integrated WAYF case.

Thanks,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page