shibboleth-dev - RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Ian Young'" <>, "'Tom Scavo'" <>
- Cc: "'Chad La Joie'" <>, "'Shibboleth Developers'" <>
- Subject: RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 12:02:07 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Comments, anyone?
Well, there's been sort of a convention by me to use an element named
<Extensions> in the SP configuration file and in SAML 2 for that matter. The
Java SP, for example, could already use the Extensions element to carry your
Plugin element.
-- Scott
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, (continued)
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/06/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Walter Hoehn, 07/06/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/06/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Chad La Joie, 07/06/2005
- RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Scott Cantor, 07/06/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Ian Young, 07/08/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Tom Scavo, 07/08/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Ian Young, 07/08/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Ian Young, 07/09/2005
- RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Scott Cantor, 07/09/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Ian Young, 07/09/2005
- RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Scott Cantor, 07/09/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Ian Young, 07/11/2005
- RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Scott Cantor, 07/11/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Ian Young, 07/11/2005
- RE: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Scott Cantor, 07/11/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Brent Putman, 07/08/2005
- Re: More defined custom extensions mechanism, Chad La Joie, 07/08/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.