shibboleth-dev - RE: resolvertest
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>
- To: Scott Cantor <>
- Cc: Shibboleth Dev Team <>
- Subject: RE: resolvertest
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:59:41 -0800 (PST)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Scott Cantor wrote:
> The dummy implementation of targetedID is really not suited for real
> use, as we've noted on irc, you really need to generate and store the
> values in a directory/database.
Eh? I thought the whole point of the targetedID implementation was that
the per-target ID could be computed deterministically as f(user, target),
hence no storage needed.
- RL "Bob"
- resolvertest, Mark Earnest, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- Re: resolvertest, Mark Earnest, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Mark Allen Earnest, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Mark Allen Earnest, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- Re: resolvertest, Walter Hoehn, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Mark Allen Earnest, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Mark Allen Earnest, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 02/18/2004
- RE: resolvertest, Scott Cantor, 02/18/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.