shibboleth-dev - Re: attribute URIs
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Walter Hoehn <>
- To: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>
- Cc: Keith Hazelton <>, Scott Cantor <>, , "'Shib Design Team'" <>
- Subject: Re: attribute URIs
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:18:02 -0400
Since this is my last chance, I'm going throw up my hand here and admit that I don't really get this. Are we planning to enumerate the semantics of all attributes in our registry? I wouldn't think so. If we aren't, then we have to rely on external documents to do so. This being the case, what is so nasty about a naming scheme that groups things based on these same documents. It seems to me that flattening the namespace makes things harder for us to manage (since we have to refer to external documentation for EVERY attribute, instead of groups of them) and less clear to users (something like "uid" could mean any number of things more or less specific than what is outlined in RFCs 1274/2798, do I really want to have to look at the registry to tell which sort of "uid" we are talking about here?).
-Walter
P.S. I know we are trying to cut a release, so I'll shut up now if asked.
RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
Thinking about all this makes me think, contrary to where I started out,
that basing any of this naming on documents is just a bad idea.
Documents are revised. They only include some stuff of interest, not
other stuff. Some stuff you want isn't in any particular document (yet).
In this case, if eduPerson doesn't cover some stuff but eduOrg does, do we
have to put some defs under urn:mace:dir:eduorg#foo? This is the sort of
hand-wringing it would great to avoid. We're going to have to live with
this stuff for a long time, which is why I'm pressing for a scheme that
requires the least justification and the least process-churn going
forward. Which is why I (now) recommend just having a bucket where these
named definitions go, without adding other dependencies to it.
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Re: attribute URIs, (continued)
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/13/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/13/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/13/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/13/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/13/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/12/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Steven_Carmody, 06/12/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/12/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/12/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/12/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/13/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Walter Hoehn, 06/16/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/16/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Derek Atkins, 06/16/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/16/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/16/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/16/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/17/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/17/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/18/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/18/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/18/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/13/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/12/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Scott Cantor, 06/12/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/12/2003
- RE: attribute URIs, Steven_Carmody, 06/12/2003
- Re: attribute URIs, Keith Hazelton, 06/13/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.