Shibboleth Developers

[Keith Hazelton <>]

The reason I think it's ok to put things like cn and mail under the 
eduperson arc is because the eduPerson spec points to the relevant 
defining rfcs or to x.520 if there's no rfc, for each of these person, 
orgPerson and inetOrgPerson attributes. The eduPerson spec even adds 
some notes on usage that amount to profiling their use in higher ed 
within the bounds of the x.520/rfc definitions.

         --Keith
______________________
On Thursday, Jun 12, 2003, at 21:43 America/Chicago, Scott Cantor wrote:

> > On my reading of Scott and RL"Bob," I would guess Scott at
> > least would opt for
> >
> > urn:mace:dir:eduperson#cn
> > urn:mace:dir:eduperson#mail
> > urn:mace:dir:eduperson#eduPersonScopedAffiliation
>
> I don't feel strongly about the first two. I'm not familiar enough 
> with the relevant specs to know what the right "arc" within
> mace:dir should be for attributes defined externally, but I didn't see 
> any reason why what we proposed for eduPerson attributes
> would be inconsistent with anything.
>
> -- Scott
________________________________________________________
Keith Hazelton                  Senior IT Architect, UW-Madison
(608) 262-0771                  Division of Info. Technology
(608) 877-0977 (home)           1210 W. Dayton St., rm. 2164
http://arch.doit.wisc.edu/keith      Madison, WI  53706

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at 

   http://archives.internet2.edu/

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--