shibboleth-dev - RE: Packaging woes
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: 'Derek Atkins' <>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: Packaging woes
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:54:45 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Yes. I was thinking "/opt/shibboleth" for a built tree that includes:
> xml2
> xslt
> xmlsec
> xerces-c
> log4cpp
> apreq
> saml
> shib
That makes sense.
> > People could build from source without as much trouble if updating
to
> > a working compiler was easier.
>
> It wasn't hard for me.
3.04 was easy, but the 3.1/3.2 rpms overwrite/update gcc (unless you do
some complex stuff, I guess), so that would make people more nervous.
Also, on RH 7.2, you need a newer rpm, which is a really ugly upgrade.
-- Scott
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Packaging woes, Scott Cantor, 10/23/2002
- Re: Packaging woes, Derek Atkins, 10/23/2002
- RE: Packaging woes, Scott Cantor, 10/23/2002
- Re: Packaging woes, Derek Atkins, 10/23/2002
- RE: Packaging woes, Scott Cantor, 10/23/2002
- Re: Packaging woes, Derek Atkins, 10/23/2002
- Re: Packaging woes, Derek Atkins, 10/23/2002
- RE: Packaging woes, Scott Cantor, 10/23/2002
- Re: Packaging woes, Derek Atkins, 10/23/2002
- RE: Packaging woes, Scott Cantor, 10/23/2002
- Re: Packaging woes, Derek Atkins, 10/23/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.