perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Pol Llovet <>
- To: perfsonar-user <>, "Remsik,Robert" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:28:26 +0000
Just to chime in, these are precisely the same things we are using PS for. With one addition: given the requirement by NSF to have perfsonar numbers to back things up, we have a portable perfsonar node to do ad-hoc testing to evaluate point-in-time health of a network endpoint.
Robert: My experiences is that if you go over ~20 testing endpoints, the PS gui gets very slow. Maybe that's been corrected?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM Jason Zurawski <> wrote:
Hey Robert;
Thanks for offering this clarification - the short answer is ‘no’, there isn’t a succinct location that describes these sorts of use cases. The longer answer is:
1) it is needed
2) the project can address these (and others)
3) in the meantime - there are oodles of (admittedly) scattered things that address these use cases on the training page:
http://www.perfsonar.net/about/training-materials/
In particular you may want to look at the “Deployment and Regular Testing” materials on this page:
http://www.perfsonar.net/about/training-materials/201503-ps-training/
It may help you with some of the items below, and if you have additional questions we can drill down more.
I will alert you, and the list, when we are able to address #2 from my list above.
Thanks;
-jason
> On Mar 24, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Remsik,Robert <> wrote:
>
> Thank you I do have further questions about deployment.
>
> After talking it over, I think I have three use-cases I'm trying to
> accomplish. I'm not sure if there is a better way to go about it, but
> I'm hoping to satisfy them with two different perfsonar installs(one for
> internal testing and one for external research testing) because I don't
> know if it's possible do it all with one box or if it should be done
> with one box. Any advice you can offer would be appreciated - if I'm
> trying to make the tool do something it's not supposed to do better to
> find out sooner rather than later. :)
>
>
>
> -=- Use Case 1 -=-
> An on site/off site user says the network is slow; we ask them to use
> NDT to send us the results to see if there is a bottleneck between them
> and the perfsonar box. These can be researchers or standard desktop
> users.
>
> -=- Use Case 2 -=-
> Setup OWAMP, BWCTL, NPAD, and tracerout tests to our ISP, and sister
> universities running perfsonar so we can verify 10GB connectivity
> between researchers. This seems best to setup as individual tests from
> our perfsonar box rather than a mesh because of the multiple ownership
> domains. And because one sister university may not care about
> connectivity to another sister university.
>
> -=- Use Case 3 -=-
> Setup OWAMP, BWCTL, and NPAD to run regular tests from key points(~2-200
> depending on hardware pricepoint) in our network to a perfsonar box so
> we can proactively say that not only is that section of the network
> hooked up with 1Gb or 10Gb, but we can consistently and routinely pass
> ~900Mb/~9Gb of traffic across that link with no loss. Since this is all
> under one management domain a mesh deployment(coupled with maddash)
> makes sense, except that it doesn't make as much sense for each
> different section to talk to every other section; mostly we care about
> to/from the central perfsonar testing box.
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Robert
>
> On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:23 -0400, Michael Johnson wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> Generally the best place to look for documentation is
>> http://docs.perfsonar.net/
>>
>> and it appears you already found the FAQ.
>>
>> The best way to bring new boxes online depends on what you're trying to accomplish, but many people use the netinstall to get started. Here's the Quick Start guide:
>>
>> http://docs.perfsonar.net/install_quick_start.html
>>
>> I'm not aware of an "etiquette" guide or anything of that nature, but mostly it's a matter of common sense (don't run excessive tests against one host, etc).
>>
>> Let me know if you have further/more specific questions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michael
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 08:51:32PM +0000, Remsik,Robert wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> As I slowly making progress getting the different perf-sonar features
>>> online, it occurs to me that there might be a best-practice guide for
>>> bringing new boxes online and or being a good perfsonar citizen on the
>>> net. But my eyes did not find anything resembling as such when scouring
>>> the flicking images on my monitor, so I thought I'd ask if there was
>>> such a guide(s).
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance,
>>> Robert
>>>
>>> --
>>> Robert Remsik
>>> Academic Computing and Networking Services
>>> Colorado State University
>>> (970) 491 7120
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Robert Remsik
> Academic Computing and Networking Services
> Colorado State University
> (970) 491 7120
>
- [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Remsik,Robert, 03/23/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Michael Johnson, 03/23/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Remsik,Robert, 03/24/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Jason Zurawski, 03/24/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Pol Llovet, 03/24/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Jason Zurawski, 03/24/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Remsik,Robert, 03/24/2015
- Re: [perfsonar-user] PerfSonar Best Practices, Michael Johnson, 03/23/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.