perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Jeff W. Boote wrote:
> We have already been encouraged by OGF to move protocol things there. 
> We plan to do that as we have time. (But certainly not before we go to 
> edit those docs the next time.)

The work is being done under OGF umbrella so I think it's reasonable to 
move protocol stuff to OGF.

Roman


> jeff
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Joe Metzger wrote:
>
> > Jeff, Antoine & the PS Steering Committee,
> >
> > The SVN repo contains a couple different kinds of objects.
> > I don't recall any discussion about where the perfSONAR collaboration
> > protocol documents should be hosted.
> >
> > Has this been discussed, and a conclusion made?
> > If not, who should be involved in the discussion?
> >
> > I can think of 3 possible directions, and I am sure there are others:
> >  A. Leave the protocol docs in the I2 repo
> >  B. Migrate the protocol docs to the GEANT
> >  C. Migrate the protocol docs to the OGF (maintaining history in I2 & 
> > GEANT repo's)
> >
> >
> > --Joe
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jeff W.Boote wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 3, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Antoine Delvaux wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > As most of you probably know, we, GEANT contributors to perfSONAR,
> > > > have to migrate content of the SVN repository to GEANT provided SVN
> > > > repo.  This GEANT repo will still be available for reading to the
> > > > world (like current anonsvn pS repo) and to writing to whoever ask for
> > > > access (and probably agree to some GEANT rules).
> > >
> > > That sounds good Antoine. I'm sure there are some of us (non-EU 
> > > participants) that will want to have access. One thing that would 
> > > find especially helpful, and would encourage you to continue,  is 
> > > having the svn change logs still sent to an email list. This is one 
> > > of the best ways for developers to communicate what they are doing 
> > > with others.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > jeff
> >
> > Joe Metzger