perfsonar development work

["Jeff W. Boote" <>]

We have already been encouraged by OGF to move protocol things there.  
We plan to do that as we have time. (But certainly not before we go to  
edit those docs the next time.)

jeff

On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Joe Metzger wrote:

> Jeff, Antoine & the PS Steering Committee,
>
> The SVN repo contains a couple different kinds of objects.
> I don't recall any discussion about where the perfSONAR collaboration
> protocol documents should be hosted.
>
> Has this been discussed, and a conclusion made?
> If not, who should be involved in the discussion?
>
> I can think of 3 possible directions, and I am sure there are others:
>  A. Leave the protocol docs in the I2 repo
>  B. Migrate the protocol docs to the GEANT
>  C. Migrate the protocol docs to the OGF (maintaining history in I2  
> & GEANT repo's)
>
>
> --Joe
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jeff W.Boote wrote:
>
> > On Nov 3, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Antoine Delvaux wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > As most of you probably know, we, GEANT contributors to perfSONAR,
> > > have to migrate content of the SVN repository to GEANT provided SVN
> > > repo.  This GEANT repo will still be available for reading to the
> > > world (like current anonsvn pS repo) and to writing to whoever ask  
> > > for
> > > access (and probably agree to some GEANT rules).
> >
> > That sounds good Antoine. I'm sure there are some of us (non-EU  
> > participants) that will want to have access. One thing that would  
> > find especially helpful, and would encourage you to continue,  is  
> > having the svn change logs still sent to an email list. This is one  
> > of the best ways for developers to communicate what they are doing  
> > with others.
> >
> > thanks,
> > jeff
>
> Joe Metzger