perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

Cesaroni Giovanni wrote:
[snip]
> > What are the drawbacks of such methods?
> > Could it be a way of providing easy to install perfsonar web-services 
> > or it will decrease their performances?
>
> The use of VMW has no particular drawbacks other than what Jochen said,
> but I don't think it is a good solution:
> all the sw is usually installed on a linux box by the package manager of 
> the system (for debian apt-get, for red hat yum and so on) from a pakage 
> (.deb, .rpm, ..) with just a command. It will be nice to have such a 
> linux package of each perfsonar service.

What is the difference with ANT currently used?

> Moreover, in this case, the upgrade of the sw to a new release will be 
> very easy.

How is it easier?

Thanks :-)

Cheers,
Nicolas

> Cheers,
> Giovanni
>
> > Cheers,
> > Nicolas
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Giovanni
> > >
> > > Nicolas Simar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > several users have asked to have something really simple for 
> > > > installing perfsonar web-services.
> > > > As way of facilitating means, I have heard of HELL (DFN plan) and 
> > > > VMWare.
> > > >
> > > > Could someone explain me:
> > > > a) what is HELL
> > > > b) what is its difference with VMWare
> > > > c) are there other system that could allow someone to deploy quickly 
> > > > and easily some tools.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,

--
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________