Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] question on LS registration (XML schema for registration)

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] question on LS registration (XML schema for registration)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Martin Swany <>
  • To:
  • Cc: ulisses <>, ,
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] question on LS registration (XML schema for registration)
  • Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:07:53 -0500

On Nov 30, 2006, at 9:58 AM, Jason Zurawski wrote:

If you look at some of the examples (specifically https:// svn.internet2.edu/svn/perfsonar/trunk/perfsonar/schema/example- instances/sonar/LS/test/LSRegisterRequest.xml)
notice that the 'capability' i.e. what the MA is capable of delivering is placed in metadata blocks, inside of each data section below the service description. Any description (domain name, or other specific things) that TOPS is capable of delivering should be described in the underlying data, and not at the service level.

I don't know if that's the best. I can actually believe that the
"domain" of a service is a first-class bit of information. I'm
also wondering if it is tied to the AS functionality somehow.

(It would also help control the mLS functionality, wouldn't
it?)

regards,
martin




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page