Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] question on LS registration (XML schema for registration)

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] question on LS registration (XML schema for registration)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: ulisses <>
  • To: Jason Zurawski <>
  • Cc: Martin Swany <>, ,
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] question on LS registration (XML schema for registration)
  • Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:02:22 +0100

On 2006-11-30 10:12:27, Jason Zurawski wrote:
> Martin;
>
> >
> >I don't know if that's the best. I can actually believe that the
> >"domain" of a service is a first-class bit of information. I'm
> >also wondering if it is tied to the AS functionality somehow.
> >
> >(It would also help control the mLS functionality, wouldn't
> >it?)
> >
>
> What if a topology service is serving information for multiple domains,
> do we necessarily want all of that information in the service level
> description? To me this is 'data', it is something that a service has,
> but does not define the existence of the service.

but again, I don't know which xml element should I include in the data,
none fits our needs (eg: It is not a Node), and then we should use
something like anyElement and then some kind of ad-hoc "domain" element.

is this right?

Metadata =
element nmwg:metadata {
(
Identifier &
MetadataIdentifierRef? &
MetadataContent
),
anyElement*
}

regards

Ulisses

_______________________________ __ ___________________________________
/_/
Network Operation Center __ __ Email:

RedIRIS/Red.es /_/ RedIRIS /_/
Edificio Bronce __ Tel: + 34 912127625
Pza. Manuel Gómez Moreno, s/n /_/ Urgencias: + 34 629148201
E-28020 Madrid Fax: + 34 915568864

_________________ Spanish Academic & Research Network _______________________



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page