ndt-users - Re: My NDT just did not work
Subject: ndt-users list created
List archive
- From: "Ken Bellars" <>
- To: "Richard Carlson" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: My NDT just did not work
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:15:33 +0100
Rich,
Thanks so much for walking me through building my own NDT. The first suggestion actually fixed the problem.
Now its running cool but I think there is still a problem (most likely the last.).
My C2S speed is far greater than the S2C. See below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
click START to re-test
Connected to: 196.207.6.22 -- Using IPv4 address
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test ( Client -to- Server [C2S] ) . . . . . 44.25Mb/s
running 10s inbound test ( Server -to- Client [S2C] ) . . . . . . 1.48Mb/s
The slowest link in the end-to-end path is a 10 Gbps 10 Gigabit Ethernet/OC-192 subnet
Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link
[ S2C ]: Excessive packet queuing detected
click START to re-test
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know it has to do with the 'etc/sysctl.conf' but i can't think of the solution because I was using the sample you sent to me.
I will appreciate your input in this regard.
Regards,
Kenny
On 10/17/06, Richard Carlson <> wrote:
Hi Kenny;
There is a bug in the Web100 user library (libweb100) that the NDT server
process hits. To see if this is the case, add the "-4" option to the
web100srv process. You can modify the /etc/init.d/ndt script to change the
WEB100SRV_OPTIONS line or manually kill/restart the web100srv process.
The other reason could be a hung web100srv process. I introduced a bug in
the client code that MAC and BSD hosts using the command line client can
trigger. I've fixed the client code and am looking for a server side fix
now. Send me the output from the "netstat -nat" command if the above
action doesn't fix this problem.
Rich
At 03:04 AM 10/17/2006, Ken Bellars wrote:
>Richard,
>
>I have done the above and now what Ii keep getting is
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Protocol error!
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Is any wrong on my side?
>
>Thanks
>Kenny
>
>
>On 10/13/06, Richard Carlson <
><mailto:> > wrote:
>Hi Kenny;
>
>Here's a copy of the stuff I add to my /etc/sysctl.conf file.
>
># NEW parameter for 2.6.13 kernels. Set to Reno style CC
>net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = reno
>
># TCP Tuning data added 7/28/05 RAC
># increase Linux TCP buffer limits
>net.core.rmem_max = 33554432
>net.core.wmem_max = 33554432
>net.core.rmem_default = 65535
>net.core.wmem_default = 65535
>
># increase Linux autotuning TCP buffer limits
>net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
>net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65535 16777216
># net.ipv4.tcp_mem = 1024 65535 524288
>
># Turn on Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) processing
>net.ipv4.tcp_ecn = 1
>
>A few things to note.
>
>The INSTALL file that comes with the NDT package is suppose to have this
>information. Unfortunately the current tarball contains a generic GNU
>based INSTALL file. The NDT specific version has been returned and future
>tarballs will contain this tuning info.
>
>Also note that the net.ipv4.tcp_mem settings are commented out. Looking at
>the Linux documentation it appears that the kernel does a better job of
>setting the right values than manual intervention. I recommend letting the
>kernel handle this.
>
>One last thing, the latest Linux 2.6.x kernels do autotuning. Thus these
>tuning values try and set both reasonable default (64KB) and max limits (16
>- 32 MB). This autotuning can be turned off by using the NDT "-b value"
>option. I don't recommend using this option, but it is there in case you
>need it.
>
>To learn more about this follow the links on the main NDT web page to the
>PSC and LBNL tuning pages. Or google "tcp tuning" to find these pages.
>
>Rich
>
>At 06:32 AM 10/13/2006, Ken Bellars wrote:
>
>
> >I have my NDT running perfectly now.
> >
> >I however noticed that editing the config file sysctl.conf affects the
> >report.
> >
> >I need to know the best config for the more close to accrate report
> >
> >Thank you.
> >
> >Kenny
>
>------------------------------------
>
>
>
>Richard A. Carlson e-mail:
><mailto:>
>Network Engineer phone: (734) 352-7043
>Internet2 fax: (734) 913-4255
>1000 Oakbrook Dr; Suite 300
>Ann Arbor, MI 48104
>
------------------------------------
Richard A. Carlson e-mail:
Network Engineer phone: (734) 352-7043
Internet2 fax: (734) 913-4255
1000 Oakbrook Dr; Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
- My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/05/2006
- Message not available
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Richard Carlson, 10/05/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/10/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/13/2006
- Message not available
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Richard Carlson, 10/13/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/17/2006
- Message not available
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Richard Carlson, 10/17/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/17/2006
- Message not available
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Richard Carlson, 10/20/2006
- NDT web100clt not working, Laurence Kirchmeier, 10/25/2006
- Re: NDT web100clt not working, Richard Carlson, 10/25/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Richard Carlson, 10/13/2006
- Message not available
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/13/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Ken Bellars, 10/10/2006
- Re: My NDT just did not work, Richard Carlson, 10/05/2006
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- My NDT just did not work, bellars, 10/05/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.