mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:50:01 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Should the new line 63 be
> if (doc) {
> rather than
> if (dom) {
No, all elements have an owning document, but the extra conditional is a
duplicate, I'll fix it up.
-- Scott
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, (continued)
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/19/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/19/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/19/2010
- [OpenSAML] SAML Profile question, Chris Card, 08/26/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] SAML Profile question, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] SAML Profile question, Chris Card, 08/26/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.