mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Chris Card <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:52:03 +0000
- Importance: Normal
Hi Scott > I think I have a fix, FWIW, bug's filed here: > https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/CPPXT-61 I see you've submitted the fix (http://svn.middleware.georgetown.edu/view/cpp-xmltooling?view=rev&revision=768). Should the new line 63 be if (doc) { rather than if (dom) { ? Chris |
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, (continued)
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/19/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/18/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Chris Card, 08/19/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Signature validation, Scott Cantor, 08/19/2010
- [OpenSAML] SAML Profile question, Chris Card, 08/26/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] SAML Profile question, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] SAML Profile question, Chris Card, 08/26/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.