OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

I was talking at java-xmltooling.  Encode what, I think, is a best 
practice (or a practice least likely to mess things up).

Brent Putman wrote:
> Scott Cantor wrote:
> > > In this specific case I propose we use the Exclusive w/ comment C14N
> > > algo as the default.
> > >
> > > Scott, Brent, what do you think?
> > >     
> >
> > My preference is for w/o comments, but I don't feel strongly about it. That
> > is my current default. Generally speaking I'm wary of people expecting
> > comment fidelity when my marshalling support won't allow it.
> >   
>
>
> Yeah, I feel the same, i.e. no strong feelings either way.  Having a 
> default at the java-opensaml2 level sounds fine, and exclusive w/o 
> comments would seem to make more sense since we don't support comments 
> in the marshall/unmarshalling layer anyway.

--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
 http://www.switch.ch