mace-opensaml-users - Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Brent Putman <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:18:01 -0500
Scott Cantor wrote: In this specific case I propose we use the Exclusive w/ comment C14N algo as the default. Scott, Brent, what do you think?My preference is for w/o comments, but I don't feel strongly about it. That is my current default. Generally speaking I'm wary of people expecting comment fidelity when my marshalling support won't allow it. Yeah, I feel the same, i.e. no strong feelings either way. Having a default at the java-opensaml2 level sounds fine, and exclusive w/o comments would seem to make more sense since we don't support comments in the marshall/unmarshalling layer anyway. |
- [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Scott Cantor, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Message not available
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Brent Putman, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Brent Putman, 01/31/2008
- RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Scott Cantor, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.