mace-opensaml-users - RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:47:47 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> In this specific case I propose we use the Exclusive w/ comment C14N
> algo as the default.
>
> Scott, Brent, what do you think?
My preference is for w/o comments, but I don't feel strongly about it. That
is my current default. Generally speaking I'm wary of people expecting
comment fidelity when my marshalling support won't allow it.
-- Scott
- [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Scott Cantor, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Message not available
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Brent Putman, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Brent Putman, 01/31/2008
- RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Scott Cantor, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.