mace-opensaml-users - Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:51:54 +0100
- Organization: SWITCH
Yeah, true. Mine doesn't either, of course. So w/o is fine with me.
Scott Cantor wrote:
In this specific case I propose we use the Exclusive w/ comment C14N
algo as the default.
Scott, Brent, what do you think?
My preference is for w/o comments, but I don't feel strongly about it. That
is my current default. Generally speaking I'm wary of people expecting
comment fidelity when my marshalling support won't allow it.
-- Scott
--
SWITCH
Serving Swiss Universities
--------------------------
Chad La Joie, Software Engineer, Security
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zürich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 15 75, fax +41 44 268 15 68
,
http://www.switch.ch
- [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Scott Cantor, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Message not available
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Brent Putman, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Brent Putman, 01/31/2008
- RE: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Scott Cantor, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Dimuthu Leelarathne, 01/31/2008
- Re: [opensaml] Default Canonicalization Algorithm, Chad La Joie, 01/31/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.