mace-opensaml-users - RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Vandit Garg" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 09:49:28 -0700
Scott, thanks for the prompt reply.
From reading the Open SAML Wiki, I notice that Shibboleth is listed as
one of the products using Open SAML. If that's the case, why would Open
SAML 2.0 be awaiting development conclusion of Shibboleth 2.0? Shouldn't
it be the other way round, that Shibboleth 2.0 be pending Open SAML 2.00
release?
One more question, are you aware of any alternate SAML 2.0 java
implementation or toolkit? Either open source or commercial?
Thanks much !!
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Cantor
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Vandit Garg;
Subject: RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline
> Thanks Scott. Your answer prompts me to ask when will Shibboleth 2.0
> be done? Please guide me if this is not the right place to ask that
> question.
Hopefully early next year, I guess. It'll be done when it's done.
-- Scott
- Open SAML 2.0 timeline, vandit . garg, 10/02/2006
- RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Scott Cantor, 10/03/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Vandit Garg, 10/03/2006
- RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Scott Cantor, 10/03/2006
- RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Vandit Garg, 10/03/2006
- RE: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Scott Cantor, 10/03/2006
- Re: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Andreas Vallen, 10/04/2006
- SV: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Harald Stendal, 10/04/2006
- Re: SV: Open SAML 2.0 timeline, Andreas Vallen, 10/04/2006
- Turning off Log4J., Giuseppe Sarno, 10/04/2006
- Re: Turning off Log4J., Walter Hoehn, 10/04/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.