OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Scott Cantor wrote:
> > Yes, OpenSAML 2.0 will support all versions of SAML.  The current 
> > OpenSAML implementation will remain in it's current CVS branch and will 
> > be bug fixed, and maybe have new features added, for some period of 
> > time.  In theory, OpenSAML 1.1 and 2.0, at this time, could run side by 
> > side.
>
>
> That wasn't my impression, but I assume by this you mean that even though
> there's some package overlap, nothing directly conflicts?

Correct.  I am trying hard to make sure that despite some package name 
overlaps, classes themselves do not conflict.  This isn't a promise that 
when this version is released this will be true, only that I'm trying to 
keep that in mind as I go along.
--
Chad La Joie             315Q St. Mary's Hall
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124