Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: OpenSAML 2.0: Initial Information

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: OpenSAML 2.0: Initial Information


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Chad La Joie <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: OpenSAML 2.0: Initial Information
  • Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:42:03 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cYrx2/0kOoOToLXKVtsH96SRn/QVxLqDMgoGhO72XbZHMdDSFqQEj6qHT6tirGLli0/apPrjJ0WxW27rC9S6IBoLQoIY9PIlJ3thW0xKV5aFzl1Zp72yzLtnzZtBx/5T5FSIG8IQlvpj0fBvWSDo7ZBB38JBk+y6uruqT93jtfM=
On 11/1/05, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
>
> I don't know if OpenSAML 2.0 will support SAML 1.X metadata, I hadn't
> brought that up with Scott.

Since GridShib has settled on SAML 1.1/Shib 1.3, this would be highly
desirable for us. Also, GridShib relies on another OASIS spec, the
SAML Metadata Extension for a Standalone Attribute Requester. Will
OpenSAML 2.0 support that?

> As I mentioned above, at this time, OpenSAML 2.0 could be
> used alongside of OpenSAML 1.1 so you could use OpenSAML 2.0 metadata
> and use the OpenSAML 1.1 SAML core and protocol classes.

That's probably what we'll do, thanks.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page