mace-opensaml-users - Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Chad La Joie <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:24:22 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HhABjJrAkaQvmYljdwBJY3FLx89NtBiV+pW9N0qis8xpw+4umgc+m1fF9DUuvnBFhlj+r0TvFz3oIThXt4YV9S0yAROCt+WDgIBvkXgswqJj2RD5zalciAIVeJNuuK+dkFDXZFzbQawLqw/b2lE2I7/hhx+IR6t2ooqSgJ+r9bQ=
On 8/26/05, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> The bug isn't specific to 1.3, it just happened to occur in a class we
> added to make OpenSAML work with 1.3.
Ah, okay, now I see what happened: org.opensaml.artifact.URI
Just curious, but will OpenSAML 2.0 continue to be restricted to JDK 1.3?
Tom
- Scoped attributes, Thomas N. Demeranville, 08/15/2005
- RE: Scoped attributes, Scott Cantor, 08/15/2005
- AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Sivabalakrishnan.G, 08/26/2005
- RE: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2005
- RE: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2005
- Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
- Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Chad La Joie, 08/26/2005
- Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
- RE: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2005
- Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Chad La Joie, 08/26/2005
- Re: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Tom Scavo, 08/26/2005
- RE: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2005
- RE: AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Scott Cantor, 08/26/2005
- AssertionFailedError in opensaml, Sivabalakrishnan.G, 08/26/2005
- RE: Scoped attributes, Scott Cantor, 08/15/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.