OpenSAML user discussion

["Scott Cantor" <>]

> Ah, yes.  I see it now.  I guess I was looking for something like a
> setStatus/Exception() method.  I build the response as I get information
> from different methods, so I guess I wasn't looking at doing it all at
> once in the constructor.  Thanks for the tip.

Well, there should also be something along those lines as well, although
that stuff came later. Maybe that was an oversight. That would arguably not
be needed in the sense that with 1.1, a Response with an error in it really
can't have anything else in it anyway.

-- Scott