Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

["Michael R. Gettes" <>]

aha!  that helps me think about this more.  i will need to spend some time 
with the use cases to see what is really of interest.  one way of going about 
this would be to create a jira item for Rules UI and then subitems linked to 
the Rules UI and then let people use Jira to vote for the Rule they want 
implemented.  But, i suppose not everyone has an account on jira and i am not 
sure if this is how you wanna do things.  so, i’ll shut up now.

/mrg

On Dec 23, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Chris Hyzer 
<>
 wrote:

> I think a first pass is to take the rules that are most useful (and built 
> in) and make specific UIs in certain places for them.
> 
> For instance, the next generation composite (if not an employee anymore, 
> remove from this ad hoc group), or inherited privileges (every group in 
> this folder or subfolder should have "app:whatever:etc:admins" to be an 
> admin.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael R. Gettes 
> [mailto:]
>  
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 3:27 PM
> To: Chris Hyzer
> Cc: 
> 
> Subject: Re: grouper rules UI
> 
> Yup, Grouper Rules!  :-)  not loader definitions.  Grouper Rules are code 
> snippets.  Of course, there could be specific functions implemented as 
> Grouper Rules like inheritance.  This is where I am not sure what a UI 
> should like.  My apologies if I am confusing you (and others).
> 
> /mrg
> 
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Chris Hyzer 
> <>
>  wrote:
> 
>> I thought you were talking about the "grouper rules":
>> 
>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+rules
>> 
>> But you might also be talking about loader definitions?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael R. Gettes 
>> [mailto:]
>>  
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 12:31 PM
>> To: Chris Hyzer
>> Cc: 
>> 
>> Subject: Re: grouper rules UI
>> 
>> yeah, well, i'd love to do so - BUT, i have no idea what i am asking 
>> for... i know this... entering in rules as some code for things like 
>> inheritance is important to me and being able to see what rules exist and 
>> where would be a great first step - but beyond that i have no idea what 
>> i'm asking for... there's lots of capability here.  if you think this is 
>> sufficient as a start, i will do so.
>> 
>> /mrg
>> 
>> On Dec 18, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Chris Hyzer 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Michael,
>>> 
>>> Can you add this to the community requests on this wiki, and include 
>>> which rules are most important for the first pass.
>>> 
>>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/Grouper/Grouper+UI+redesign+v2.2
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chris Hyzer 
>>> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 7:53 PM
>>> To: 'Michael R. Gettes'
>>> Cc: 
>>> 
>>> Subject: RE: grouper rules UI
>>> 
>>> Well, the more vocal people are about wanting enhancements, the more 
>>> likely it will be sooner than later.  So in your case, I think we can do 
>>> it pretty quickly (month or two after 2.2 release?)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Michael R. Gettes 
>>> [mailto:]
>>>  
>>> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 9:13 AM
>>> To: Chris Hyzer
>>> Cc: 
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: grouper rules UI
>>> 
>>> Chris, thank you so much.  Any chance you want to guess as to what the 
>>> radar says for getting it in there?  Nobody will hold you to it, just 
>>> trying to get a feel for things.
>>> 
>>> /mrg
>>> 
>>> On Dec 13, 2013, at 19:32, Chris Hyzer 
>>> <>
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Its not in scope for 2.2, but we have it on the radar...
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> [mailto:]
>>>>  On Behalf Of Michael R. Gettes
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 4:45 PM
>>>> To: 
>>>> 
>>>> Subject: [grouper-users] grouper rules UI
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Does anyone have a UI for viewing grouper rules?  A UI for managing 
>>>> grouper rules?  Will there be anything supplied with the new grouper UI 
>>>> coming in the version of grouper when the UI significantly changes for 
>>>> the better?
>>>> 
>>>> many thanks
>>>> 
>>>> /mrg
>>> 
>> 
>