grouper-users - RE: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Gagné Sébastien <>
- To: "Tim Darby" <>
- Cc: "Michael R. Gettes" <>, "Rahul Doshi" <>, <>
- Subject: RE: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:41:51 -0400
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport07.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
That’s a good question, I increased some of them but I don’t have any specific number if anything changed. The biggest time consumer are LDAP requests, e.g. Subject find requests, you could try to put a much larger subject cache, I believe it’s the entries with “edu.internet2.middleware.grouper.subj.”, at least it those that I increased. De : [mailto:] De la part de Tim Darby We have 360,000 groups and almost 3,000,000 memberships and it takes approximately 10 hours to bulk sync. One thing I noticed this morning is that I haven't made any changes to ehcache.xml. How important is that for good performance? Tim Darby On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Gagné Sébastien <> wrote: How horrible ? Here it takes about 15 minutes to run for 13 000 groups and a total of 400 000-something memberships De : [mailto:] De la part de Tim Darby
Thanks for the reference, I'm glad to see this is being worked on. Bulk sync performance is horrible here and I'm trying to figure out why. Tim Darby On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Michael R. Gettes <> wrote: Have a look at https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/GRP-882 yes, 3 is the current limit but the jira item is intended to work towards fixing this problem. /mrg On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:20 PM, Tim Darby <> wrote: I noticed that I'm only getting 3 pooled connections too. So, is it true that Grouper ignores the settings in ldap.properties? Does increasing the pool size really result in much of a benefit? Tim Darby On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Rahul Doshi <> wrote: I added/modified following lines in LdapSourceAdapter.java and I can see
|
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tim Darby, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Michael R. Gettes, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tim Darby, 03/20/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Gagné Sébastien, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Rahul Doshi, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Rahul Doshi, 03/20/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Gagné Sébastien, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Rahul Doshi, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tim Darby, 03/20/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Gagné Sébastien, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tom Zeller, 03/21/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Rahul Doshi, 03/20/2013
- RE: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Gagné Sébastien, 03/20/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tim Darby, 03/20/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tim Darby, 03/21/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Tim Darby, 03/22/2013
- Re: [grouper-users] vt-ldap pooling, Michael R. Gettes, 03/20/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.