grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions

Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions

From: Tom Zeller <>
To: Scott Koranda <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:33:58 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=w4K9YvPFOZN2CO+OnwEzEMsfFCS0r+jFDW1G7uN0+xviFDB4PjcY0HB8ARGDWyIKfC iavj1cZqzvWElnPugF34IFlRcT4l2PH64tDR4Rmjx2i/nJdG+hT844lBJp++NUyxOVZ4 IwuO6arUWIsdXi4IOgG+XVRFCMR9Vm6VYscNc=

> Instead I see that the ldappcng process is using a constant
> %70 - %100 of a CPU at all times.

Not desirable. What's your environment - built from source, OpenJDK, linux ?

[grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Scott Koranda, 10/01/2010
- Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Tom Zeller, 10/05/2010
  - RE: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Chris Hyzer, 10/05/2010
    - Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Scott Koranda, 10/05/2010
      - RE: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Chris Hyzer, 10/11/2010
        
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Tom Zeller, 10/11/2010
        
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Scott Koranda, 10/11/2010
        
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Tom Zeller, 10/11/2010
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Scott Koranda, 10/11/2010
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Tom Zeller, 10/11/2010
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Paul Poputa-Clean, 10/11/2010
        Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions, Rob Hebron, 10/11/2010

List archive

Re: [grouper-users] ldappcng performance questions