grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?
Subject: Grouper Developers Forum
List archive
Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?
Chronological Thread
- From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
- To: Chris Hyzer <>, Keith Hazelton <>, Scott Koranda <>
- Cc: Tom Dopirak <>, paccman <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:10:37 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
On 7/15/11 12:01 PM, "Chris Hyzer"
<>
wrote:
>Well, we are designating a timezone, not a timestamp, right?
I'm saying avoid timezones at all costs. Callers can locally convert as
needed, for display, input, whatever.
But if you don't want to avoid them, don't try and set the timezone as
some kind of extra field. Use a date/time format that includes the time
zone designation to clearly indicate what the absolute time value is.
>Though I could also accept a timestamp in some format. Grouper uses the
>format for WS currently:
I would avoid custom formats, and just use the ISO standard.
>We could make timezone be a part of that optionally... can you do
>everything with GMT? E.g. timezones like Indiana cant be translated to
>gmt right?
Timezones are just an offset from UTC. An ISO time in UTC (not really GMT)
has a "Z" in the time zone designator. Anything else is represented as a +
or - offset in hours after the local time value. The same value can always
be represented as a local time with offset, or a UTC time. Using the
latter is easier to use in terms of consistently storing and passing
around the values.
-- Scott
- [grouper-dev] RE: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, (continued)
- [grouper-dev] RE: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/07/2011
- [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Tom Dopirak, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Tom Dopirak, 07/15/2011
- RE: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Tom Dopirak, 07/15/2011
- RE: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Scott Koranda, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Scott Koranda, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Keith Hazelton, 07/15/2011
- RE: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Cantor, Scott E., 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Scott Koranda, 07/15/2011
- RE: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Tom Dopirak, 07/15/2011
- RE: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/15/2011
- Re: [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Tom Dopirak, 07/15/2011
- [grouper-dev] Re: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Tom Dopirak, 07/15/2011
- [grouper-dev] RE: [paccman] built-in permissions limits... do we need any more?, Chris Hyzer, 07/07/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.