Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-dev - RE: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 7-July-2010

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

RE: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 7-July-2010

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chris Hyzer <>
  • To: Tom Barton <>, Shilen Patel <>
  • Cc: Grouper Dev <>
  • Subject: RE: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 7-July-2010
  • Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:29:51 -0400
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US

> permissions, etc in grouper. I'm curious: if we had another way of
> determining PIT audit info, could we turn things around and do flattened
> notifications using that infrastructure?
> Tom

Sure, though I was thinking that not all groups/folders would be "marked" for
PIT auditing. i.e. maybe you test folder could be excluded. Also, even if
flattened/PIT are built as is currently designed, they could leverage each
other. For example in the flattened table each membership has a start date.
Only when it is deleted will it be inserted into the PIT table, instead of
duplicate records. This will cut down the number of records in the DB by the
number of existing memberships... not sure if it is worth it or there are
other drawbacks, just mentioning...


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page