Grouper Developers Forum

[Tom Barton <>]

Thanks Shilen.

Seems like a time/space trade off between options 2 and 3, and we chose 
to burn space rather than time for 1.6. Is that about right? Is 3 also 
simpler than 2?

I don't think I'd made the firm connection before between point in time 
audit and other systems that need a flattened view of memberships, 
permissions, etc in grouper. I'm curious: if we had another way of 
determining PIT audit info, could we turn things around and do flattened 
 notifications using that infrastructure?

Tom

Shilen Patel wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I just added some documentation on the flattened membership table design.
>
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/GrouperWG/Flat+Memberships+Design
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Shilen
>
>
> On 7/7/10 3:01 PM, Emily Eisbruch wrote:
> > [AI] (Shilen) will write up design objectives of the flattened 
> > memberships table.