Grouper Developers Forum

[Tom Barton <>]

You can replace the subject-0.1 with subject-0.2.1 in signet 1.0.1 
without problems. I have - works great.

Tom

Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
> Well, signet should definitely be using subject 0.2.1, don't you think? The
> JNDI support and the customizable SQL are big improvements.
>
> -K
>
>
> On 8/1/06 7:26 PM, "Tom Barton" 
> <>
>  wrote:
>
> > blair christensen. wrote:
> > > subject              0.2.1
> > I think signet ships with subject v0.1. Also, in comparing lib versions
> > with subjects, I note below a few discrepancies from what you'd reported.
> >
> > Dave Donnelly wrote:
> > > One more comment- The "Subject" project should also be considered
> > > when creating/maintaining i2mi-common.
> > Hmm. Subject has its own 3rd party lib dependencies. Perhaps it too
> > should rely on i2mi-common and not be embedded within it?
> >
> > While I'm at it, adding subject v0.2.1 to blair's tables yields
> >
> >                       Grouper1.0    Subject0.2.1    Signet1.0.1
> > commons-beanutils    1.6           1.6
> > commons-collections  3.1           3.1             2.1.1
> > commons-dbcp         1.2.1         1.2.1           1.2.1
> > commons-digester     1.6           1.6
> > commons-logging      1.0.4         1.0.4           1.0.4
> > commons-pool         1.2           1.2             1.2
> > hibernate            2.1.8         2.??[1]         2.1.8
> > jconn2                             5.5
> > junit                3.8.1         3.8.1           3.8.1
> > log4j                1.2.8         1.2.8           1.2.8
> >
> > [1] - the version, whatever it is, is some 2.X earlier than 2.1.8.
> >
> > Tom