Grouper Developers Forum

[Kathryn Huxtable <>]

Is anyone actually using Signet in production? Other than Stanford's custom
version, I mean?

-K


On 8/1/06 2:34 PM, "blair christensen." 
<>
 wrote:

> On 7/24/06, Dave Donnelly 
> <>
>  wrote:
>> Typically, on other projects I've been involved with, whenever there are
>> common 3rd-party libraries shared among subsystems and/or projects, a
>> Common project is established as a container for those libraries.
>> Dependent projects share the responsibility of maintaining Common. It is
>> left to dependent projects to determine how to integrate and deploy
>> their product. It actually alleviates some of the headaches associated
>> with deployment when Common can be distributed as a standalone product.
> 
> I just went through the HEAD `lib/README.txt` file for both Grouper
> and Signet in order to see what we already have in common and what we
> could possibly have in common.
> 
> Grouper and Signet currently have the following libraries in common.
> I've also included the latest version available for each library.
> 
>                      USING   LATEST
> * cglib-full         2.0.2   2.2 beta 1
> * commons-dbcp       1.2.1   1.2.1
> * commons-logging    1.0.4   1.1
> * commons-pool       1.2     1.3
> * dom4j              1.4     1.6.1
> * junit              3.8.1   4.1
> * odmg               3.0     3.0
> 
> If there aren't objections, I think I'll create an *i2mi-common* (or
> whatever it should be called) project in CVS that contains these
> libraries and then switch Grouper over it.  The question in my mind
> would be whether to continue to use the versions of these libraries
> that both projects are currently using or whether to try and upgrade.
> I'm inclined to try and use the latest of each by default and then we
> can back off if that is problematic for either Grouper or Signet.
> 
> 
> Grouper and Signet are using different versions of the following libraries:
> 
>                      GROUPER       SIGNET
> commons-collections  3.1           2.1.1
> commons-lang         2.0           1.0.1
> ehcache              0.9           0.8
> jta                  1.0.1B        ?
> 
> In **theory** these probably wouldn't be too much trouble to add to
> *i2mi-common* as well.
> 
> 
> And these are the libraries that are only used by one of the projects:
> 
>                      GROUPER       SIGNET
> ant                                1.5.3
> c3p0                               0.8.4.5
> commons-beanutils    1.6
> commons-digester     1.6
> concurrent                         1.3.3
> connector                          ?
> GroboTestingJUnit    1.2.1-core
> GroboUtilThread      1.0.0alpha2
> hibernate2           2.1.8
> hsqldb               1.7.2.11
> jaas                               ?
> jboss-cache                        1.0.2
> jboss-common                       ?
> jboss-jmx                          ?
> jboss-system                       ?
> jcs                                1.0-dev
> jdbc2_0-stdext                     ?
> jgroups                            ?
> jug                  1.1.1
> log4j                1.2.8
> optional                           1.5.3
> oscache                            2.0
> proxool                            0.8.3
> subject              0.2.1
> swarmcache                         1.0rc2
> xalan                              2.4.0
> xerces                             2.4.0
> xml-apis                           ?