Grouper Developers Forum

[Kathryn Huxtable <>]

Well, signet should definitely be using subject 0.2.1, don't you think? The
JNDI support and the customizable SQL are big improvements.

-K


On 8/1/06 7:26 PM, "Tom Barton" 
<>
 wrote:

> 
> 
> blair christensen. wrote:
>> subject              0.2.1
> 
> I think signet ships with subject v0.1. Also, in comparing lib versions
> with subjects, I note below a few discrepancies from what you'd reported.
> 
> Dave Donnelly wrote:
>> One more comment- The "Subject" project should also be considered
>> when creating/maintaining i2mi-common.
> 
> Hmm. Subject has its own 3rd party lib dependencies. Perhaps it too
> should rely on i2mi-common and not be embedded within it?
> 
> While I'm at it, adding subject v0.2.1 to blair's tables yields
> 
>                       Grouper1.0    Subject0.2.1    Signet1.0.1
> commons-beanutils    1.6           1.6
> commons-collections  3.1           3.1             2.1.1
> commons-dbcp         1.2.1         1.2.1           1.2.1
> commons-digester     1.6           1.6
> commons-logging      1.0.4         1.0.4           1.0.4
> commons-pool         1.2           1.2             1.2
> hibernate            2.1.8         2.??[1]         2.1.8
> jconn2                             5.5
> junit                3.8.1         3.8.1           3.8.1
> log4j                1.2.8         1.2.8           1.2.8
> 
> [1] - the version, whatever it is, is some 2.X earlier than 2.1.8.
> 
> Tom