Re: Help needed on VoIP project

["john p. streck" <>]

Guy and Jon,
This is true but one must have a working end to end system (some through put) at least some
of the time before this comes to the head of the list.

progression:  not working>working sometime>working good but not ideal> working just like ma bell
(just a joke)

later,
john



On Mar 1, 2004, at 9:15 AM, Guy T Almes wrote:

> Jon,
> I agree.
> Robustness of user experience in the presence of good-but-perhaps-not-very-good IP service is one way to put it.
> Regards,
> -- Guy
>
> --On Monday, March 01, 2004 07:54:31 -0500 Jon Zeeff <> wrote:
>
> > This is somewhat off topic, but to me, the most important thing to test
> > is resistance to packet loss and jitter.
> >
> > > VoIP project.  One of the 2004 projects is to evaluate SIP
> > > interoperability between various vendors SIP based instruments and other
> > > vendors SIP based servers.  The goal is to document the level of
> > > interoperability.  Listed below is a partial list of desired voice
John P. Streck PE
<x-tad-smaller>Director-Networking R&D, </x-tad-smaller>NC State University
Director NC-ITEC
<x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller>work:		919.515.0106<x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller>mobile	<x-tad-bigger>				 </x-tad-bigger>919.601.1647
work fax:					 919.513.1893
Email: 		
<x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>Mailing Address:
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>2620 Hillsborough Street</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>Raleigh</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller> </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>North Carolina</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller> 
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>27695-7109</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>United States of America</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
</x-tad-smaller>