Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] ongoing PIC.edu federation discussion

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

Re: [wg-pic] ongoing PIC.edu federation discussion


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Deke Kassabian <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [wg-pic] ongoing PIC.edu federation discussion
  • Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:04:05 -0400


--On July 7, 2008 3:10:08 PM -0400 "Michael R. Gettes" <> wrote:
If nobody wants to rise up with the "raising of the bar" then you
have learned a lot about the service you can offer. This is known
as being "market driven". There is nothing preventing you from
offering tiered services all under the brand of PIC.edu, is there?

Nothing but a vague sense of confusion for countless users. "Now, I can believe that that's Michael, but I can't believe that that's Deke, right?" :-/

^Deke



/mrg

On Jul 7, 2008, at 12:04, Deke Kassabian wrote:

Folks,

I know we have an upcoming call this Thursday. I'm hoping we can
finish up or at least continue the discussion we started two
Thursdays ago when Peter Saint-Andre and Michael Gettes joined the
call to help us discuss goals and approaches to federation of
PIC.edu implementations on member campuses.

Here's where I think we are...

The major goals when considering federations was, I think, identity
assurance in an inter-institutional way, and IM spam (spim)
avoidance.

The majority of those expressing an opinion, notably including
Rodney McDuff (before the call), Peter Saint-Andre and Michael
Gettes all appear to be recommending a very "low hurdle" for a
variety of good reasons. I think I'm coming around to this notion.
If PIC.edu had guidelines to those deploying, advice and best
practices, perhaps we could avoid technical barriers to entry that
will only tend to frustrate users and organizations and accomplish
little.

I think the goals are good goals. I guess I'm concerned that if
there's no hurdle at all and we want to create one or raise the bar
a bit later we'll have trouble doing so. That is, those who
deployed PIC.edu with us in the early days but are unable or
unwilling to get slightly more strict in terms of user
authentication, chasing misbehaving users, or (much later) inter-
institutional server-to-server authentication will make it harder
for us to achieve this higher level without considering "kicking
folks out" of PIC.edu.

Can we take that up in Thursday's discussion?

-------
Deke Kassabian, Senior Technology Director
Information Systems and Computing, University of Pennsylvania
http://kassabian.org/deke/ --
Jabber/XMPP:





-------
Deke Kassabian, Senior Technology Director
Information Systems and Computing, University of Pennsylvania
http://kassabian.org/deke/ --
Jabber/XMPP:




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page